Attorney to file charges IDU exdirectivos and officials for irregularities in contracts arterial road network

The Second District Attorney file charges against Liliana Pardo and Nestor Eugenio Ramirez Gaona Cardona, in his capacity as Director General of Urban Development Institute (IDU), Ana Maria Valencia Ospina, deputy general corporate, Luis Esteban Prada Breton, deputy general technical ; Innocent July Melendez, legal coach, Luis Eduardo Acosta Medina Road Mesh coach, Luis Rafael Marquez Barrera, deputy technical director of Bids and Tenders, Constanza Eliana Medina Pabuence, technical director of Maintenance, and Lucy Yaneth Sanchez, William Fabian Calderon Helda and Maria Torres, university professionals at the time of the facts, misconduct in contract, following the award of contracts 071, 2008, initial value of $ 87,398,750,260 and 072 of 2008, totaling $ 100,487. 124,278.

In the case of Liliana Pardo Gaona, were charged by public tender to award the IDU-LP-DG-006-2008 GTM the Joint Venture (Group 3) and (Group 4), without having checked and made an objective selection of contractors in terms of legal capacity, experience, financial capacity and organization of the bidders. The contract 071 of 2008, the firm Translogistic, which contributes 40% share, submit financial statements indicating the weak capacity of procurement was at the time of bidding. 072/2008 In the contract, the firm Solutions Log Ltd., has weaknesses in its financial statements and although it had 50% participation.

On the other hand, for the award which made the Public Bidding IDU-LP-DG-006-2008, Group 4, the Joint Venture Bogotá Roads 2009, 072 contract was signed in 2008, without that comply with the Temporary the requirements of the specifications.

Liliana Pardo charges are also related to bypass the control and monitoring of contract performance, which led to the submission of a significant backlog of some works, low repayment of the funds given to the contractor as advance payment and possible detriment heritage.

These behaviors were rated very serious offense as an extremely serious fault.

Yaneth Lucy Sanchez Calderon and William Fabian Helda Maria Torres, members of the Evaluation Committee IDU were asked as serious offenses as an extremely serious fault, the financially enable the Group 4 final evaluation of expensive public bidding IDU-LP DG-006-2008 to the Temporary Roads Bogotá 2009, without this proposal complies with the requirements of the specifications.
 
Ana Maria Valencia Ospina, Luis Esteban Prada Breton, Innocent July Melendez, Luis Eduardo Acosta Luis Medina and Rafael Marquez Barrera, were formulated as serious offenses as an extremely serious fault, have enabled and allowed in Public Hearing December 26, 2008 The award expensive Competitive Bidding IDU-LP-DG-006-2008, Group 4, the Joint Venture Way of Bogotá 2009, without that did not meet the Temporary comply with the requirements of the specifications.

A Luis Eduardo Acosta Medina, Nestor Eugenio Ramirez Cardona and Constanza Eliana Medina Pabuence, were asked a very serious offense malicious, for failure to take appropriate measures at the continuing violations of the above road network contracts, signed with the Joint Venture (GTM) and the Temporary Roads in Bogota, which was what led to significant delays and non-performance of some works, low repayment of the funds given to the contractor as advance payment and equity potential detriment.

The alleged detriment equity interest in the implementation phase of these contracts, as reported by the Comptroller of Bogotá, is about $ 9,237 and amounts of $ 10,934 million pesos, respectively. Unknown legal regulations, among others, is the Law 80 of 1993 (State Procurement Regulations) Act, 1150, 2007 (Amendment Act 80 of 1993), Resolution 5389 of 2005 IDU, and the Appropriations Committee Manual IDU-002 functions Agreement 2009.